Interviews / Los Angeles Philharmonic / Music News & Info: Classical

A chat with Michele Zukovsky (part 2 of 2): on German clarinets, German conductors, life after the LA Phil, and more

Michele Zukovsky 2 - Nov 2015 (photo by CK Dexter Haven)
Michele Zukovsky, Principal Clarinet of the Los Angeles Philharmonic, wraps up her amazing 54-year tenure with the orchestra in an all-Rachmaninoff concert today at 2pm; Cristian Măcelaru conducts.

Below is the second part of my interview with her (Part 1 is HERE).  In it, we chat about her switch from a French clarinet to a German one, some observations about conductors good and bad, and her plans for the future . . . . 


CK Dexter Haven:  How do you [and the other LA Phil Principal or Associate Principal] decide who plays what?

Michele Zukovsky:  How we decided between me and Lorin [Levee] originally was that we flipped a coin.  I started playing first [chair], then the next weekend he would play first.  Honestly, my career is as long as it has been because of that co-principal situation.  I don’t think I would’ve lasted as long as principal clarinet otherwise.  You know Burt [Hara, the LA Phil’s Associate Principal], asked me that same question.

It’s another bit of luck.  I’ve been lucky my whole life.  I didn’t like it at first, but it grew on me.

CKDH:  So going back to when you got hired, Zubin joined the next year or so.  It is pretty well known that he has always loved your playing.  That said, he also went public not long after becoming Music Director that he didn’t believe women should be in orchestras.

MZ:  [Laughs]  Yeah, but he changed his mind.  WE changed his mind.

CKDH:  You and Barbara Winters [the LA Phil’s former Principal Oboe].

Zubin Mehta at the Hollywood Bowl in 1961 (photo by Otto Rothschild)MZ:  Right.  Yeah, he changed his mind.  Little by little.  When I first joined the orchestra, there were only five women.  Playing in an orchestra was considered “a man’s job.”  But at the same time, you had all these great women as solo pianists.  My mother-in-law was a great pianist, but she had to stay at home and raise the kids.  Now, it’s an even playing field and we can all work.

CKDH:  So I’ve heard a few different stories about how and why you switched from a French clarinet to a German clarinet, a Wurlitzer.  Some stories have said Zubin asked you to make the switch, some say it was your decision.  What’s the truth?

MZ:  The truth is that it was my decision.

They didn’t make mouthpieces so good back then to get the sound I liked.  I had to work too hard to get the sound I wanted out of a French clarinet.  So I tried a German mouthpiece back in 1970, and I said, “Wow, that’s incredible.  I don’t have to work so hard.”  So I put the German mouthpiece on a French clarinet, but that was too out of tune.

Eventually, my husband [the late clarinetist Charles Zukovsky] and I bought two Wurlitzers.  They’re very hard to play, but if you play correctly, like a teaching aide, you sounded really great and it made me play correctly my whole life.  If you didn’t play correctly, you’d sound terrible.

I like the French for Ravel and other similar repertoire.  But Zubin did a lot of Mahler, Bruckner, Strauss.  And he did everything else too.  To me, it all sounds better on the German.

CKDH:  No one else you’ve played with in the section has ever played a German clarinet, have they?

MZ:  No.  I don’t even let my students play it.  It’s too hard.  You lose 30% of your technique.

CKDH:  So how long did it take for you to make the transition from the French to the German?

MZ:  I did it in one day.

CKDH:  Oh my God!

MZ:  I put the French clarinet down, I picked up the German clarinet, and that was that.

CKDH:  You just walked on stage one day and . . .

zukovzky004MZ:  Yup, walked on stage and played it.  It was hard, I wasn’t sounding so good for a year. [chuckles]  In 1971, I changed and my father [Kalman Bloch] helped me cover the hard parts.  But by 1978, I did the Corigliano Clarinet Concerto and the German sounded great.  I think.  I don’t know.”

CKDH:  I’m sure it did.

MZ:  Anyways, that’s what happened.  I’m sure Zubin said, “I want you to go to Germany or Austria and . . .”  It’s not true.  I taught myself.  I never had a lesson on the German clarinet.

CKDH:  Have you ever had a student come to you wanting to learn to play German and then . . .

MZ:  And then I told them not to?  Yeah, I had one student.

There were other [principal] clarinetists that did it.  Larry Combs in Chicago played German when Barenboim ran the orchestra because he liked that sound.  And what was the name of the conductor from the Concertgebouw when my father was in the orchestra?

CKDH:  Eduard van Beinum?

MZ:  Yes, van Beinum.  He wanted my father to play a Wurlitzer, but he didn’t.

I think the Buffet is great.  It’s really about who’s playing, who’s behind the wheel. . . .

But I’m not a very good teacher though, I have to say.

CKDH:  How can you say that?

MZ:  Because I’m a natural.  It’s very hard for me to give specifics like, “You should do this or that.”  Instead, I’m like, “Pick up the clarinet and do it like I do it.“ [she chuckles].

CKDH:  Not exactly the way Yehuda Gilad [famed clarinet pedagogue who teaches at USC and Colburn] does it.

MZ:  Now Yehuda is incredible.  He’s got the gift, he’s got magic. When kids come to me, I say, “Look, all I can do is teach you the clarinet.  I don’t have anything going for me.  Study with Yehuda if you want to learn special things.”  He’s incredible.

CKDH:  It’s amazing how many of his students have ended up with major gigs in orchestras all over the world.

MZ:  I know!  Why?  How?!!  He’s just incredible.  I took a lesson with him to find out.

CKDH:  You took a lesson?

MZ:  Oh yeah, I wanted to see how he taught.  I think he had me ride a stationary bike before playing or something like that [laughing].  Whatever he does, it’s remarkable.

. . . .

CKDH:  Did you play at all in the studios too?

MZ:  I did.  A lot.

CKDH:  Did you enjoy that?

MZ:  No. Not particularly.

CKDH:  Why?

MZ:  I don’t know.  I just . . . I mean, a couple of studio calls with John Williams were nice.  There were a couple of tracks with some nice clarinet licks, but mostly, no.  I’d rather just watch grass grow or take a walk [laughing].  That’s just me. . . .

CKDH:  John Williams wrote his Clarinet Concerto for you, and you’re the only one who he’s ever let play it.

MZ:  I don’t think he likes it.  I mean, I like it, but . . .

CKDH:  Maybe you can come back and play it again.

MZ:  No, I’d rather do something different, like play early clarinet.  I need a new challenge.

. . . .

CKDH:  From your perspective, how was Zubin Mehta as a Music Director?

MZ:  Wonderful.  Very engaging, very caring.

CKDH:  He hasn’t guest conducted the LA Phil in the past few years, but before that, he visited fairly often.  How different is he now to when he was Music Director.

MZ:  Very different.  I heard him from the audience when he was 26.  He was a very physical conductor.  He relied on that, it was his energy.  And now he’s slowed down a lot, that’s what happens.  He was more of a showman back then, he wanted to put on a good show and feel the passion.

CKDH:  Then going from him to Carlo Maria Giulini was a big transition.

MZ:  Giulini was so refined and NOT a showman.  More spiritual, like Toscanini.  He was afraid of Beethoven, so of course, at some point we did it a lot.  He was a wonderful musician.  If I were to be a conductor I would’ve imitated the way he conducted.  Though he was sometimes too slow.  Too darn slow, man!  Don’t you think? [laughs]

Giulini - LA Phil - Beethoven 3CKDH:  I think of the Beethoven 3rd you and the orchestra did with him.

MZ:  I don’t listen to my recordings really.  How was it?

CKDH:  Really slow!  [laughing]  Let’s call it “spacious.”

MZ:  He was wonderful, but I don’t think he was [at his best] in symphonic repertoire.  I think he was best with opera, as are most Italian conductors, because that’s what Italian composers wrote.  I think German conductors tend to be best with symphonies because they were more often written by German composers, French conductors with Debussy and Ravel, English with English . . .

CKDH:  And American conductors with Gershwin, Copland, and Barber?

MZ:  Unfortunately, yes.  That’s true, unfortunately.  You got it. . . .

Though there was [one young German conductor] who made his debut with us many years ago and was just awful in rehearsal, full of himself, treated us poorly.  Finally, at one point during rehearsal, he said he was having trouble expressing himself in English because he didn’t speak it very well.  And I said out loud, “Don’t bother, you’re not coming back!”

[We both laugh]

I used to have a vast collection of Beethoven symphonies, and I put together my ideal Beethoven 9th, movement by movement.  It was like Mengelberg, Furtwängler, and two others that were perfect.

That tradition has been diluted through the years.  You’re not looking necessarily at the way Brahms did it when he was alive, we’re not going to hear or feel the way Brahms did it in the 1890’s.  It’s not being passed down very much longer.

Now, you’ve got these great young performers doing Vivaldi violin concertos where they’re making it a whole new thing.  It’s like alive and they’re improvising.  It doesn’t have to be the way Vivaldi did it, and they’re phenomenal and I can feel it.  That’s the way we’re going now.

Music can be very boring now when you’re just trying to repeat the same old thing over and over instead of making it your own.  Now, even with the period instrument orchestras, they’re starting to all sound the same.  I used to listen to 33s and could tell within the first three downbeats who the conductor was and where the orchestra was from.  Now, not so much.

CKDH:  Isn’t the overall quality of musicians better in orchestras?

MZ:  Yes, but it all is starting to sound too generic.

CKDH:  Is that because of the recordings?  Or the conductors traveling all over the world?

MZ:  Partly.  The conductors are tired.  They just want to make a nice, safe performance.

I think that’s one of the reasons I’m glad to be done.

CKDH:  I was gonna ask this later, but since you brought it up, I’ll ask it now:  why are you leaving?  People all over the place, including myself, other regular concertgoers, even people inside the orchestra, all think that you you still sound awesome.  Why did you pick now?

MZ:  I’d rather leave five years too soon than two years too late.

CKDH:  Had you pondered leaving earlier?

MZ:  I tried to retire a couple of times, but they just said, “No.” [She grins]  . . . But it’s time.  Now I have a new life partner and a whole new life awaiting me.

CKDH:  Good for you.  What does that life look like — away from music?

MZ:  I don’t know, honestly.  We’ll see where life takes us.  He’s brilliant.  He’s someone to be with and have a good time with.

I’ll teach, I’ll play chamber music concerts.  It’s just time to leave.  I’m going to be 73.

It has nothing to do with the clarinet playing.  I haven’t really practiced for years.  I haven’t.

CKDH:  People will love to know that!!  When was the last time you “woodshedded” a piece?

MZ:  I’m too senile to remember!  Usually, if I just practice a piece for an hour, I get it.  It’s terrible, but it’s true.  Maybe I just don’t have high standards.

CKDH:  I find that interesting and hard to believe.

MZ:  Maybe I’ll learn Spanish, then learn the piano or something.  I’ll teach lots of kids.

CKDH: You’ve played so many different things:  orchestral works, chamber music, concertos, solos.  Is there anything that you’re going to particularly miss playing?

Michele ZukovskyMZ:  I’m going to miss it all.  Don’t think I’m not going to miss a single bit of it, that wonderful sound that washes around me, playing great music.  I love it.

I just didn’t want to deal anymore. . . .  I’m always having to look for a reed and having it wear out.  I think I got a little lazy.

I watched my father go through retirement, and I swore I’d never do it that way.  He was 67.  It’s very hard [retiring].  Don’t get me wrong, it’s the hardest thing I’ve ever done. . . .

It’s going to be very difficult.  I’m probably not going to come around and won’t hang out. . . . I just don’t want to be around the orchestra for a while.  I want to make a clean break, close this chapter and move onto another chapter.

There’s another world out there.  [In this job], you get very focused in on one thing because you have to sound good.  You have to let a lot of things go, you have to let the world go by you, and I don’t want to do that anymore.

CKDH:  Well 73 or not, you’re still in good shape, both musically and physically.

MZ:  That’s the time to leave!

CKDH:  While you can still enjoy everything else.

MZ:  Mmm-hmm.  I think I want to cook.  Learn to cook.

CKDH:  Do you cook now?

MZ:  I don’t cook at all!

CKDH:  There’s a new adventure for you.  Maybe the next time we have lunch, you can cook for us.

MZ:  Oh, I don’t think I’d put you through that.

. . . .

CKDH:  Any final thoughts for everyone?

MZ:  Yes, something I’d really like you to share:  orchestra musicians need you, the audience.  We can play very well without an audience, but we feed off your energy.  It’s synergistic and it makes the concert experience special.  Thank you and please keep coming.


Michele Zukovsky’s final concert as Principal Clarinet of the Los Angeles Philharmonic will be 2pm, Sunday, December 20, 2015:

Cristian Măcelaru, conductor
Kirill Gerstein, piano

Rachmaninoff: Vocalise, Op. 34, No. 14
Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 2 in C minor, Op. 18
Rachmaninoff: Symphonic Dances, Op. 45



Photo credits:

  • Michele Zukovsky, November 2015:  photo by CK Dexter Haven
  • Zubin Mehta in 1961 at the Hollywood Bowl:  photo by Otto Rothschild from the Los Angeles Philharmonic archives
  • Michele Zukovsky (black & white):  courtesy of the Chamber Orchestra of the South Bay
  • album cover:  courtesy of Deutsche Grammophon
  • Michele Zukovsky at Walt Disney Concert Hall:  courtesy of the Los Angeles Philharmonic

9 thoughts on “A chat with Michele Zukovsky (part 2 of 2): on German clarinets, German conductors, life after the LA Phil, and more

  1. And it was a glorious concert finale to a glorious career.
    She received more than one standing ovation, and seemed a bit overwhelmed by the adulation.
    Well earned retirement time.
    She leaves the orchestra in very fine hands all the way around.


  2. Pingback: ‘Don’t bother,’ I told the conductor, ‘you’re not coming back’ – Slipped Disc

  3. It was so wonderful to be at the concert yesterday. Yes, Michelle was great and I am sorry that she will be leaving, as I have known her since Thomas Starr King Middle School and John Marshall High School. Being in the orchestras with her was a gift.


  4. i remember you too, Rhoda!
    yes, we are at the age when everyone we know from our class has retired!!!!
    hope all is good with you!


  5. Who was the woman sitting to the right of Burt Hara during last weekend’s Bronfman/Mahler concert?
    She most definitely looked like she wanted to take over for Michele.
    She also seemed very comfortable with the program.


Leave a Reply to Rhoda Unger Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.